Whilst this conversation seems rhetorical, I do hope to learn and contribute to
this mystery of volatile forex spreads imposed upon us.
Now that's adding too
1. broker fees open and close
2. overnight swaps
3. triple wednesday swaps
4. retail traders losses (some 80-90%)
Now if spreads were a real thing and not "engineered" to transfer wealth from the retail trader to the broker
then, I would imagine during high liquidity times, spreads are always super tight and kept super tight/low till
liquidity diminishes some 15-30mins after the news event or market open/close
But this is not the case as during these times spreads are dramatic and retail traders can't be assured what fill they
will get, which is a big deal when most retail brokers market their services as low commissions in/out (charged in aud or usd?)
but in reality the overnight swaps and spreads will impact your profitability more than the fixed broker commissions they draw your attention too?
Brokers are really saying look at our low commissions, drawing no attention to their swaps and volatile spreads which
they market from 0 pips again misleading as they only have to offer 0 spread for 1 millisecond to market 0 spread or
the average spread over the day is irrelevant given you should trade only in highly liquid times
So here's my question, if spreads were a real thing and not broker/platform engineered and the fx market is nearly 7 trillion a day
and only 5-6% of traders are retail, then 95% of the liquidity is institutional and in staggered high volumes so spreads should be super
tight where the smart money gets in/out (their foot prints)
But this doesn't seem to be the case as Im guessing volatile spreads are more likely engineered tool for extract money from
retail as institutional would get fixed or no spreads given the position and volume they trade
Also if CFD's are created and offered by the broker/liquidity providers, then there would be an infinite supply of contracts (cfd's) not limited
so liquidity would be brought online as demand increased which in essence is what creates the spread, therefore spreads widen as they
hold back liquidity to raise the offer and vice versa aka "draw on liquidity"
These contracts are between retail trader and the broker/liquidity providers and don't usually go out to the spot market so your loss is their gain and vice versa and widening spreads or paying higher spreads are many ways to put the retail trader behind the 8 ball, not you can't make money in the most liquid markets, you just have to have an edge/system/stragety and great physcology to make and keep your profits!
Please feel free to comment. constructively challenge my post and I do hope to gain more insight or be corrected and hope we all grow
from contributions to this thread
thanks
this mystery of volatile forex spreads imposed upon us.
Now that's adding too
1. broker fees open and close
2. overnight swaps
3. triple wednesday swaps
4. retail traders losses (some 80-90%)
Now if spreads were a real thing and not "engineered" to transfer wealth from the retail trader to the broker
then, I would imagine during high liquidity times, spreads are always super tight and kept super tight/low till
liquidity diminishes some 15-30mins after the news event or market open/close
But this is not the case as during these times spreads are dramatic and retail traders can't be assured what fill they
will get, which is a big deal when most retail brokers market their services as low commissions in/out (charged in aud or usd?)
but in reality the overnight swaps and spreads will impact your profitability more than the fixed broker commissions they draw your attention too?
Brokers are really saying look at our low commissions, drawing no attention to their swaps and volatile spreads which
they market from 0 pips again misleading as they only have to offer 0 spread for 1 millisecond to market 0 spread or
the average spread over the day is irrelevant given you should trade only in highly liquid times
So here's my question, if spreads were a real thing and not broker/platform engineered and the fx market is nearly 7 trillion a day
and only 5-6% of traders are retail, then 95% of the liquidity is institutional and in staggered high volumes so spreads should be super
tight where the smart money gets in/out (their foot prints)
But this doesn't seem to be the case as Im guessing volatile spreads are more likely engineered tool for extract money from
retail as institutional would get fixed or no spreads given the position and volume they trade
Also if CFD's are created and offered by the broker/liquidity providers, then there would be an infinite supply of contracts (cfd's) not limited
so liquidity would be brought online as demand increased which in essence is what creates the spread, therefore spreads widen as they
hold back liquidity to raise the offer and vice versa aka "draw on liquidity"
These contracts are between retail trader and the broker/liquidity providers and don't usually go out to the spot market so your loss is their gain and vice versa and widening spreads or paying higher spreads are many ways to put the retail trader behind the 8 ball, not you can't make money in the most liquid markets, you just have to have an edge/system/stragety and great physcology to make and keep your profits!
Please feel free to comment. constructively challenge my post and I do hope to gain more insight or be corrected and hope we all grow
from contributions to this thread
thanks